Poll – What do you want to read about next?

I have been asked to look into additional topics around the Neonode litigation. Which I am happy to do.

So take the chance now and cast your vote on the topic.

Or comment below.

10 thoughts on “Poll – What do you want to read about next?

  1. Hi!

    Thanks for all your deep dives in to the lawsuit, really good job and appreciated. I cast my vote for worldwide volumes, it would also be interesting to hear a more elaborated thought around potential damages per unit. Is it realistic to lean on the Samsung licensing agreement for a base case and so on.

    Like

  2. could Neonode decide to not give dividends and instead keep almost everything in the company? How likely?

    Like

  3. I would love to read an analysis that goes deeper into Neonode/AQ vs. Samsung right now. Many are convinced that there is gonna be a settlement/win. Is there anything that could potentially brake the case now that enables Samsung to walk freely? If so, what is it and what are the odds of that happening?

    Like

  4. Is there a risk of another appeal, can Samsung still ”kill” the patent in this way? Or is the way forward only settlement or trial?

    Like

  5. With regards to the agreement between aequitas and neonode, what is the usual fee susman could get? Asuming they have % of the potential settlement. They joined the lawsuit in mid 2023

    Like

  6. hello Andreas, I voted other since there was not an option for discussion on all of the topics. I enjoy your analysis. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Hej, tack för du sätter dig in i caset och hjälper oss med mindre kunskap att förstå!. Jag tycler alla topics ovan vore väldigt trevligt att få större förståelse för. 😀

    Liked by 1 person

  8. As much as you can about everything mentioned. I know it is a Herculesian task and that you won’t be financially compensated, but you will have our eternal gratitude. Thank you so much for exposing this thievery. Sincerely, Joe Radano, USA

    Liked by 1 person

  9. The Chairman of the Board was asked that question a couple of years ago. He replied that the Company would only need/take a small portion and the remainder would be distributed to the shareholders; he and his close friend being very large shareholders. So a win-win for those two and the rest of the shareholders. Joe Radano

    Like

Leave a reply to Anders Holmer Cancel reply