Yes, I believe so. Why? Because that’s what Samsung does. UPDATE Nov 4As some of you have noticed, “our” case is in Western District of TX, not Eastern…(I am too used of all Eastern cases, which is the more used venue.)Nevertheless, I have update the statistics including both districts, as they can be seen as […]
So, here is the third and final part of the interview series with Jesper at Redeye — Now, lets see what else in this case I can write about. Stay tuned. — Note: I have maintained my stock position in Neonode since the initial purchase of my shares. No changes in my portfolio has been […]
The subsequent episode of the interview series featuring Jesper at Redeye has been released. This episode predominantly addresses the ongoing litigation involving Apple. — Stay tuned for next episode
This is related to future episodes of the Redeye interview. (part 1 can be found here) To address global volumes related to Samsung, it is crucial to analyze the infringement, how and where it occurs. Furthermore, the potential involvement of Google must also be assessed as it may be a contributing factor. Specifically, what is […]
Until I post the next blog entry, you can watch part 1 of my interview with Jesper at Redeye. – Next post will deal with Samsung volumes and Googles potential involvement, a sneak peak into coming parts of the interview.
How do settlement talks happen? I would dare to say that settlement discussions are ongoing throughout any litigation process. Parties involved in litigation always have a channel open, either directly or through its outside counsels. And settlement is always a topic that is brought up. In addition, settlement talks are generally confidential, meaning the discussions […]
Thank you all for your votes. The result looks like this: Some of these topics are related, Settlements and Discovery for instance, as well as Samsung WW volumes and impact on Google. So I’ll see what I can cook together, it might be a mix of topics. Anyway, first out will be: Settlement talksSharing some […]
I have been asked to look into additional topics around the Neonode litigation. Which I am happy to do. So take the chance now and cast your vote on the topic. Or comment below.
This is big! Yesterday, on August 20, (75 days after the appeals hearing) the Court of Appeals sent the case back to District Court for the Western District of Texas and its judge Alan Albright. Circuit Judges Lourie, Prost, and Stark concluded that the district court, under Judge Albright, erred in determining that the patent […]
The opinion is out! – Neonode WON (i.e Reversed and Remanded) This means now that the case is returned to District Court and the case can continue. Settlement could now be likely, especially from Samsung, since there is a smoking gun with their name on it…. ; the famous licence agreement! Apple however, will most […]
Iwerback Patent Report (IPR) 