So, here is the third and final part of the interview series with Jesper at Redeye — Now, lets see what else in this case I can write about. Stay tuned. — Note: I have maintained my stock position in Neonode since the initial purchase of my shares. No changes in my portfolio has been […]
This is related to future episodes of the Redeye interview. (part 1 can be found here) To address global volumes related to Samsung, it is crucial to analyze the infringement, how and where it occurs. Furthermore, the potential involvement of Google must also be assessed as it may be a contributing factor. Specifically, what is […]
Yesterday (July 18), two decisions came out;IPR Appeal filed by Samsung – Affirming PTABs final written decision.IPR Appeal filed by Google – Affirming PTABs final written decision. This means that the Federal Circuit supports the validity of Neonode’s 879 patent claims as non-obvious This renders into two interesting observations; We all have to wait and […]
Shortly after the hearing, the three judges came out with a decision for 993. Three working days later! That’s quick.The decision was to Affirm the IPR boards decision, that the 993 patent is invalid. Hence, Neonode’s appeal failed. It is permissible to petition the Supreme Court, though they rarely hear patent cases, and only when […]
This Thursday the Appeal live hearing was conducted, covering all four cases:22-2134 Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [993 IPR]23-2304 Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [879 District Court]23-1464 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Neonode Smartphone LLC [879 IPR by Samsung]23-1638 Google LLC v. Neonode Smartphone LLC [879 IPR by Google]The […]
Iwerback Patent Report (IPR) 