Neonode – Appeal notes, part 2 (of 2)
Review of Neonode’s (last) response (April 2024) Erroneous “Three Meanings” Conclusion: Neonode argues that Samsung failed to demonstrate that the claim term in question, specifically limitation 1[b], is indefinite. [three potential and conflicting meanings] Samsung insisted that it is unclear whether the “only one option” refers to “the ‘multi-step operation,’ a ‘function,’ or something else.” […]